Empwr builds and manages your project plan — status, risks, actions, follow-ups from your team's meetings, tickets and documents — without anyone updating it.
Get started with one project. No migration required.
No changing how you work. All smiles.
It does the heavy lifting that nobody likes to do. It frees up my time for the strategic work. It's about efficiency.
We’re dealing with manufacturers, supply chain, digital, legal, logistics… anything that gets cross-functional parties on the same page more quickly is extremely useful.
We've reclaimed 25% to 30% of our team's time back that we used to spend on project coordination. We reinvested that time to move our company forward.
Connect the meetings, tickets and documents that program already lives in. No migration, and nobody changes how they work.
Empwr derives the timeline, the decisions, the risks and the actions from what actually happened — with no plan, no tasks and no data entry first.
The picture updates as the program moves, and every claim links back to the meeting, ticket or document it came from.
Across the industry, only 36% of organizations always or mostly finish projects on time. Wellingtone, State of Project Management 2026
A decision gets made in the meeting and never reaches the ticket. Nobody's fault — nobody was assigned to carry it across.
Updating it is a fourth priority, so the status becomes a reconstruction of a week nobody fully remembers.
Status is written by a person who will be in the room when it is read. So it drifts green, and the problem surfaces at the gate review.
Empwr sits in the meetings, watches the tickets and reads the threads you point it at, and keeps one live view of where the program stands. Nobody has to write it, and nobody has to be asked for it. Automatically updated. Live Status.
Because project status is derived from evidence rather than written by a person, problems surface without anyone spending political capital to raise them. Every flag links back to the meeting, ticket or document it came from — so you can check it, and you can argue with it.
Ask what happened and why, months later, without booking time with the person who left. The program's history is held at project level rather than per person, so a handover stops meaning a loss.
Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams. Slack. Google Calendar and Outlook. Jira, Linear, Asana, Monday.com and GitHub. Google Docs, SharePoint, Notion and Confluence. Custom toolsets on request.
An MCP server hands the plan to Claude, ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot, so they answer from your program's evidence rather than from what was pasted into the chat. Not instead of your assistant — underneath it.
Empwr holds a SOC 2 Type 2 attestation, Security / Common Criteria scope.
On every plan
The same protections regardless of company size or subscription tier. Security isn't a tier.
Encrypted
Customer data is protected with encryption.
You own your data
It stays yours. We hold it on your behalf, not for our own use.
Not used to train models
Your sensitive information is never used to train AI models.
AI project management is software that uses AI to create and maintain a project plan — status, risks, actions and decisions — rather than only reporting on a plan people maintain by hand. Most solutions read an existing plan. A smaller number derive the plan itself from the meetings, tickets and documents a team already produces.
Yes, if it has access to the evidence. Empwr builds the plan from your team's meetings, tickets and documents, deriving the timeline, decisions, risks and actions across the tools you already use, without anyone entering tasks first. None of the major project tools does this — their AI reads a plan a person maintains. Microsoft's Planner agent, for example, needs a plan shared to a Microsoft 365 Group with at least ten tasks before it will produce a status report.
The assembling can be automated — chasing updates, reconciling tickets, writing the status report. The judgment can't: what to escalate, whose problem to solve first, when to change the plan. Where a PMO or a dedicated project manager exists, that person spends their time on problems instead of reports. Where nobody owns the program, nobody has to become a project manager to get a status the team can trust.
An AI notetaker summarises a meeting and stops. AI project management starts with the project and carries what was decided into the project plan, connects it to the tickets and documents it affects, and keeps the picture current between meetings. The test is whether the output changes when the project changes, or only when someone holds another meeting.
Empwr is AI project management for teams running cross-functional programs. It builds and maintains the project plan from your team's meetings, tickets and documents, so the status reflects what actually happened rather than what someone remembered to type. Every claim links back to the meeting, ticket or document it came from.
It reads the evidence the program already produces. Empwr sits in the meetings you point it at, watches the connected tickets, and reads the documents and threads, then derives the timeline, decisions, risks and actions from what it finds. There is no plan to populate and no tasks to create first — the plan is the output, not the input.
Empwr connects to the tools a program already runs on: Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams for meetings, Slack for conversations, Google Calendar and Outlook for scheduling, Jira, Linear, Asana, Monday.com and GitHub for work in flight, and Google Docs, SharePoint, Notion and Confluence for documents. Custom toolsets can be connected on request. Empwr reads across all of them rather than requiring your program to live inside one vendor's suite.
Empwr is not an either/or with Claude, ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot — it works best alongside them. Those assistants reason well over whatever you hand them; Empwr is what keeps an accurate, current picture of the program for them to reason over. Empwr exposes its project data through an MCP server, so your assistant can ask what is at risk, what was decided and what is late, and answer from the evidence rather than from whatever was pasted into the chat.
Teams running cross-functional programs where work is tracked across three or more tools no single vendor owns, decisions get made in recurring meetings not everyone can attend, and nobody can keep the picture current in between. Often that job lands on an accidental project manager — an engineer, product manager or chief of staff who never set out to run the program but ends up chasing status anyway. A dedicated PMO hits the same problem from the other direction. The shape of the work matters more than the job title.
No. Your sensitive information is not used to train AI models. Empwr holds a SOC 2 Type 2 attestation, Security / Common Criteria scope, and the same protections apply to every customer regardless of company size or subscription tier.
Every flag links back to the meeting, ticket or document it came from, so you can check it in one click and disagree with it. You can also add context at any time — correct a wrong assumption, note that something is already handled, explain what the evidence doesn't show — and Empwr takes it into account from then on. Status derived from evidence is arguable in a way that status written by a person isn't, which is the point. Raising a risk stops costing anyone political capital.
Connect the tools that program already lives in. No migration, nobody changes how they work, and you'll see where it actually stands inside a week.
