Fellow makes each meeting better, agendas, notes, action items, meeting policies. Empwr makes the program better: it treats meetings as one signal among many, synthesizes them with Jira and docs into program state, and acts on what it finds.
Your pain is meeting discipline, agendas, note quality, and per-meeting accountability.
Your pain is what happens between the meetings: decisions that don't reach the backlog, dependencies nobody re-checks, programs that drift silently. That's the AI PM's job.
Every meeting tool stops at the same place: meeting, action item, ticket. None of them can tell you when your program is drifting, when what teams say in meetings quietly diverges from what's in Jira, when a decision never becomes a ticket, when a dependency discussed in a workshop never gets logged. Empwr's AI PM watches for exactly that. It compares conversation against execution state continuously and flags drift while it's still a decision, not a delay. In our customers' words: "detect when the conversations are differing from what's in Jira."
Yes. Empwr replaces the coordination gap, not necessarily your notetaker. But most teams find the AI PM's meeting outcomes make a standalone notetaker redundant within a month.
Connect Teams or Zoom, Slack, and Jira in days, no process change. Start with one program and prove value in a 30-day pilot.
Start with one program. Connect your tools in days, not months. Prove it in a 30-day pilot.