Read.ai analyzes how your meetings went, engagement, sentiment, talk time. Empwr analyzes what your meetings mean for delivery: decisions, dependencies, risks, and drift against the plan of record.
You want meeting hygiene metrics and coaching on meeting culture.
Better-run meetings still don't ship programs. The AI PM ties every conversation to execution state and keeps the program aligned between meetings.
Every meeting tool stops at the same place: meeting, action item, ticket. None of them can tell you when your program is drifting, when what teams say in meetings quietly diverges from what's in Jira, when a decision never becomes a ticket, when a dependency discussed in a workshop never gets logged. Empwr's AI PM watches for exactly that. It compares conversation against execution state continuously and flags drift while it's still a decision, not a delay. In our customers' words: "detect when the conversations are differing from what's in Jira."
Yes. Empwr replaces the coordination gap, not necessarily your notetaker. But most teams find the AI PM's meeting outcomes make a standalone notetaker redundant within a month.
Connect Teams or Zoom, Slack, and Jira in days, no process change. Start with one program and prove value in a 30-day pilot.
Start with one program. Connect your tools in days, not months. Prove it in a 30-day pilot.